There is a story that I
love. I first came across this story when I read the prologue to Scott Peck’s
book A Different Drum. I subsequently loved it even more when it was
read at the beginning of every community-building workshop I ever attended. The
story conveys something of the radical power of respect, and I share it with
you because I am still learning its lessons.
“ There is a story, perhaps a myth. Typical of mythic
stories, it has many versions. Also, typical, the version of the story you are
about to experience is obscure. The story, called The Rabbi’s Gift, concerns a
monastery that had fallen upon hard times. Once a great order, as a result of
waves of anti-monastic persecution in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries
and the rise of secularism in the nineteenth, all of its branch houses were
lost and it had become decimated to the extent that there were only five monks
left in the decaying mother house: the abbot and four others, all over 70 years
in age Clearly it was a dying order.
In the deep woods surrounding the monastery there was a
little hut that a rabbi from a nearby town occasionally used for a hermitage.
Through their many years of prayer and contemplation the old monks had become a
bit psychic, so they could always sense when the rabbi was in his hermitage.
“The rabbi is in the woods, the rabbi is in the woods again,” they would
whisper to each other. As he agonized over the imminent death of his order, it
occurred to the abbot at one such time to visit the hermitage and ask if by
some possible chance he could offer any advice that might save the monastery.
The rabbi welcomed he abbot at his hut. But when the
abbot explained the purpose of his visit, the rabbi could only commiserate with
him. “I know how it is,’ He exclaimed. “The spirit has gone out of the people.
It is the same in my town. Almost no one comes to the synagogue anymore.” So
the old abbot and the old rabbi wept together. Then they read parts of the
Torah and quietly spoke of deep things. The time came when the abbot had to
leave. They embraced each other. “It has been a wonderful thing that we should
meet each other after all these years,” the abbot said, “but I still have
failed in my purpose for coming here. Is there nothing you can tell me, no
piece of advice you can give me that would me save my dying order?”
“No I am sorry,” the rabbi responded. “I have no advice
to give. The only thing I can tell you is that The Messiah is one of you.”
When the abbot returned to the monastery his fellow monks
gathered around him to ask, “Well, what did the rabbi say?”
“He couldn’t help,” the abbot answered. “We just wept and
read the Torah together. The only thing he did say, just as I was leaving —it
was something cryptic — was that the Messiah is one of us. I don’t know what he
meant.”
In the days and weeks and months that followed, the old
monks pondered the possible this and wondered whether there was any possible
significance to the rabbi’s words. The Messiah is on of us? Could he possibly
mean one of the monks here at the monastery? If that’s the case, which one? Do
you suppose he meant the abbot? Yes, if he meant anyone, he probably meant
Father Abbot. He has been our leader for more than a generation. On the other
hand, he might have meant Bother Thomas. Certainly Brother Thomas is a holy
man. Everyone knows that Thomas is a man of light. Certainly he could not have
meant Brother Eldred! Eldred gets crotchety at times. But, when you look back
on it, even though he is a pain in people’s sides, Eldred is virtually always
right. Maybe the rabbi did mean Brother Eldred. But not Brother Phillip.
Phillip is so passive, a real nobody. But then, almost mysteriously, he has a
gift for somehow always being there when you need him. He just magically
appears by your side. Maybe Phillip is the Messiah. Of course the rabbi didn’t
mean me. He couldn’t possibly have meant me. I’m just an ordinary person. Yet
supposing he did? Suppose I am the Messiah? O God not me, I couldn’t be that
much for You could I?
As they contemplated in this manner, the old monks began
to treat each other with extraordinary respect on the off chance that one among
them might be the Messiah. And on the off off chance that each of the monks
himself might be the Messiah, they began to treat themselves with extraordinary
respect.
Because the forest in which it was situated was so
beautiful, it so happened that people still occasionally came to visit the
monastery to picnic on its tiny lawn, to wander along some of its paths, even
now and then to go into the dilapidated chapel to meditate. As they did so,
without even being conscious of it, they sensed this aura of extraordinary
respect that now began to surround the five old monks and seemed to radiate out
from them and permeate the atmosphere of the place. There was something
strangely attractive, even compelling, about it. Hardly knowing why, they began
to come back to the monastery more frequently to picnic, to play, to pray. They
began to bring their friends to show them this special place. And their friends
brought their friends.
The story ends with the
monastery being renewed and becoming a center of light. I’ve loved this story
because it has had so much to say to me about the renewal of community, but as
I was slowly typing the story into my computer, I found myself substituting in
the word world, in my mind, for monastery. I have a feeling that if we could have the story’s
kind of extraordinary respect universally, then a wider spread renewal could
happen.
I primarily have loved this
story because it has helped me to consider myself in a different light. Besides
looking at myself as something unimaginable, and worthy of respect, I have been
dwelling with the off hand chance that I could be “that much” to anyone. As I
have come to respect that possibility, I have come to experience how much this
world of others, means to me.
“That much” has turned into so much.
My regard for the
possibility that I might not know myself well enough to be sure how much I
could mean to another has turned out to increase my regard for everybody. I am
learning that just opening to the possibility of being “that much” to anyone,
opens me to noticing how everything is “that much” to me.
I share this with you,
because I’m still leaning how to be and see “that much,” and because it means
that much to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment